gram positive streptococcus pneumoniae atcc Search Results


96
ATCC enterococcus faecium atcc 8042
Enterococcus Faecium Atcc 8042, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enterococcus faecium atcc 8042/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enterococcus faecium atcc 8042 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC gram positive bacteria
Gram Positive Bacteria, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gram positive bacteria/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gram positive bacteria - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC anaerobic gram positive coccus streptococcus mutans atcc 25175
Anaerobic Gram Positive Coccus Streptococcus Mutans Atcc 25175, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anaerobic gram positive coccus streptococcus mutans atcc 25175/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anaerobic gram positive coccus streptococcus mutans atcc 25175 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC enterococcus faecalis atcc van b v583 e
Enterococcus Faecalis Atcc Van B V583 E, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enterococcus faecalis atcc van b v583 e/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enterococcus faecalis atcc van b v583 e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
ATCC gram positive
Gram Positive, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gram positive/product/ATCC
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gram positive - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC peptides against gram positive s pneumoniae tigr4
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Peptides Against Gram Positive S Pneumoniae Tigr4, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/peptides against gram positive s pneumoniae tigr4/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
peptides against gram positive s pneumoniae tigr4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC enterococcus faecalis atcc 29212
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Enterococcus Faecalis Atcc 29212, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enterococcus faecalis atcc 29212/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enterococcus faecalis atcc 29212 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC facultative anaerobic gram positive bacteria
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Facultative Anaerobic Gram Positive Bacteria, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/facultative anaerobic gram positive bacteria/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
facultative anaerobic gram positive bacteria - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ATCC enterococcus faecium atcc 700221
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Enterococcus Faecium Atcc 700221, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/enterococcus faecium atcc 700221/product/ATCC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
enterococcus faecium atcc 700221 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
bioMerieux gmbh ast-gp67 card
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Ast Gp67 Card, supplied by bioMerieux gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ast-gp67 card/product/bioMerieux gmbh
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ast-gp67 card - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
ATCC gram positive streptococcus agalactiae
Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae <t>TIGR4</t> was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA
Gram Positive Streptococcus Agalactiae, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gram positive streptococcus agalactiae/product/ATCC
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gram positive streptococcus agalactiae - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA

Journal: The Febs Journal

Article Title: Structure‐based design of peptides that trigger Streptococcus pneumoniae cell death

doi: 10.1111/febs.15514

Figure Lengend Snippet: Protein complex disruption and subsequent in vivo cell feasibility assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. (A) In vitro ribonuclease activity assays using binding region‐mimicking peptides. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. Each mimicking peptide (10 μm) was added to 2 μm HigBA. Forty units of RiboLock TM (Thermo Scientific) RNase inhibitor was used to prevent ribonuclease contamination. (B) Size‐exclusion chromatography of HigBA, HigA, HigB, and HigB with the HigB α2 helix‐mimicking peptide added. Absorption at 280 nm is plotted as a function of the elution volume. The volume of injected protein was 100 μL, and the concentrations of proteins and HigB α2‐mimicking peptide were 200 μm and 1 mm, respectively. (C) Effect of peptides on the growth of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was measured based on the OD 600 . Error bars represent the standard error of the mean across three biological replicates. (D–I) Cell viability confirmation using flow cytometry and confocal imaging. (D) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 was treated with various concentrations of HigB α2 mimicking peptide selected by the results of the MIC test. Cells were labeled with LIVE/DEAD BacLight stains (Syto 9; PI) and analyzed by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). The results of the untreated peptide cells are also presented for comparison. Live cell/dead cell areas were established using this TIGR4 control. (E) FACS data of 6.3 μm peptide‐treated S. pneumoniae TIGR4 after 1 h of incubation. (F) Flow cytometry of S. pneumoniae TIGR4 cells obtained from untreated (cyan) and 6.3 μm peptide‐treated (purple) cells stained with the fluorescent dye PI. Detection of cell‐penetrating peptides in living cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy using (G) S. pneumoniae TIGR4 and (H) S. pneumoniae D39 containing active site‐mutated higBA (shown data are images of R73A). (G,H) Shown data are representative maximum intensity Z projection images of three independent experiments with scale bar, 25 μm. (I) FACS data of S. pneumoniae D39 that was treated with 6.3 μm peptide and contained the active site‐mutated higBA

Article Snippet: The activity of the peptides against Gram‐positive S. pneumoniae TIGR4 (ATCC ® BAA‐334 TM ) was tested.

Techniques: Disruption, In Vivo, Binding Assay, In Vitro, Activity Assay, Size-exclusion Chromatography, Injection, Flow Cytometry, Imaging, Labeling, Fluorescence, FACS, Comparison, Control, Incubation, Staining, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy